Sony DSC-F828 8MP Digital Camera with 7x Optical Zoom

DSC-F828 Good or Bad ?, January 19, 2004

I have seen a reports of purple fringing as good as noise. Here is what I’ve found. At tall ISO settings (above 200) there is alot of sound (big suprise). we usally operate a module mode as good as keep a ISO during 64 as good as my photos demeanour great.

I have not had a complaint with purple fringing. we have attempted as good as attempted nonetheless we can’t imitate a problem.

Is it as good as a ,000.00 digital SLR? No, even nonetheless that’s what it is all a time compaired to. The digital SLR which comes tighten in cost is a EOS Digital Rebel. But by a time we buy a integrate of lenses we have been in a ,500.00 range, that’s 50% some-more as good as no we can’t take a reduced video with a EOS. And a DSC-F828 tone facsimile is improved than a Canon.

Is it improved which alternative cameras in it’s class? YES! we had a Fuji S7000 as good as had to lapse it, a print peculiarity as good as focusing problems were horrible. If we wish to see purple fringing as good as sound demeanour during a Fuji S7000 photo!

The DSC-F828 takes frail transparent photos underneath all lighting conditions. It’s Auto-focus is super quick as good as accurate. The camera physique is solid. The lens has good operation as good as a macro functions great. The camera is EASY to use. You can operate a infrared environment to take cinema in a dim though peep (yes they have noise) Or we can operate a night framing to take a normal peep print in a dim as good as they demeanour great.

Why 4 stars as good as not 5? The usually obstacle is which there is no black&white setting. we similar to to see what a print is starting to demeanour similar to in black & white when I’m shooting. And a tech await is weak. we emailed tech await to see if they have been starting to do a firmware refurbish as good as referred to a b&w setting. we similar to to operate an IR72 infrared filter. And they gave me a sore response. "We aren’t starting to supplement latest chips to a camera." Tech await should know a disproportion in between program as good as hardware.

If your starting to weird out about a small sound or we wish to blow-up a print to a print distance we can operate Neat Image to mislay any noise, as good as it’s giveaway for non-commercial use.

Help alternative business find a many beneficial reviews 

Was this examination beneficial to you? 

>Report abuse
| Permalink

 Comment

This is a single of a many appropriate non-PRO cameras!, January 2, 2004

The Sony F828 is an superb product for a price/quality/capability relationship. we have used all kinds of veteran as good as semi-professional digital cameras over a years. Go forward as good as examination it to a product 5 times a cost as good as it will patently come short. It does not reinstate a veteran product, nonetheless for an desirous pledge photographer as good as mechanism consultant similar to me, who knows how to understanding with a intricacies of a digital image, this is as good as it gets.

The camera is solid, easy to use, matching in operation to all Sonys as good as functions similar to an normal SLR. The picture peculiarity is outstanding, when we know how to operate it as good as where a boundary of CCD capturing are. If we have to work a lot in unequivocally low light conditions there is no surrogate for rarely supportive movie material.

I peep all as good as whilst a in-built peep is good, we would suggest to buy a HVL-F32X which is an glorious product as good as add-on. Learn to operate a peep in each situation, even in splendid object to supplement distinctness as good as to lighten a forehead opposite a credentials glare. we have used a peep for macro-photography as good as being means to shot with a hundred opposite camera as good as peep settings as good as afterwards rught away check a result upon my cover is usually incredible.

I have used a capability to fire a array of 7 images as good as it is simply stunning. This is a initial time we have seen this work unequivocally good in a digital non-pro camera. we series-shoot all now, afterwards usually undo a rubbish. With a CF as good as Sony container we can have up to 2GB of images, in top fortitude this is 500 pictures! You do need 50 shots for ONE good photo.

The wizz lens is glorious as good as good as a camera is unequivocally pleasing as good as veteran to hold. It has a good balance. The digital viewfinder as good as a LCD work perfectly. Color peculiarity is customary Sony high-end peculiarity as good as a color-tone is simply practiced to your preference. One of a many appropriate facilities is a battery status quo (also customary Sony). With a customary battery we get 3 hours of continous operate even when we operate a flash.

Overall, this is a initial camera which indeed substitues my prior high-end SLR set.

Help alternative business find a many beneficial reviews 

Was this examination beneficial to you? 

>Report abuse
| Permalink

 Comment

Wow! 8 megapixels, good tone as good as lens!, December 27, 2003

After a prolonged wait, this camera eventually shipped prior to Christmas. The tone is great, a tall peculiarity lens, a camera is fast, as good as EIGHT megapixels, good that’s usually AWESOME! The 7x visual is additionally plus. we pondered purchasing a Canon 10d until we examination about Sony’s 8mp f828 due out in November. Despite a check (and it’s already upon behind sequence again) it was unequivocally value a wait. At 9.00 it is an implausible value. At this time, we can’t get tighten to 8 megapixels during this price. The physique has a good feel as good as is gentle to hold.

I programmed upon purchasing a digital SLR, nonetheless we did not wish to get sealed in to usually 6mp usually yet, when 8 was around a "affordable" corner.

I was regulating a nikon 5700, nonetheless returned it – concentration was painfully delayed as good as lens proposed to have a harsh sound when zoomed out. It additionally had approach as good many noise. The lens was qualtiy good along with a zoom, nonetheless it didn’t have up for a disastrous aspects of this camera.

The tone upon this camera is remarkable. As a striking designer, we work with veteran photos as good as Photoshop a good deal. We all know which Photoshop is a outrageous as good as in a digital darkroom, nonetheless it DEFINITELY helps to begin with pointy photos with a lot of pixels as good as good color.

For a dilettante to consider: mostly digital photos have as good many sound as good as not sufficient pixel report – something even Photoshop now can’t do miracles with. we mostly listen to consumers criticism they do not need five, 6 or some-more pixels, since they won’t be creation such vast prints these cameras offer. However, after a print is cropped of nonessential background, your picture needs still needs a lot of pixels to increase which portion. That is a complaint with 4mp as good as below. Five is acceptable, 6 unequivocally good. Eight -awesome! In a subsequent dual years we’ll all wish 11mp or more, nonetheless we now have to bombard out ,000 usually for a camera body!

There is additionally low sound with a f828, a complaint with many alternative digital cameras. we positively adore it! The tone is so loyal to life. Beautiful! You can sketch fast-moving young kids as good as pets with smashing formula as good as get good indoor shots as well, an area a alternative cameras in this cost operation in all tumble short. This camera indeed sets a latest standard, as good as deliberation it’s unequivocally in accord with cost tag, unequivocally value it!!!

Help alternative business find a many beneficial reviews 

Was this examination beneficial to you? 

>Report abuse
| Permalink

 Comment